How to figure the value of testing? A start: ask how you value eyeglasses, radios, smoke alarms, yardsticks: things that help you observe. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/michaelbolton/status/17909459689
A microscope produces nothing of value on its own, but it helps people to observe things that provide or threaten value. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/michaelbolton/status/17909541879
You don’t evaluate your eyeglasses by how many vision cases they executed today. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/michaelbolton/status/17910243521
How many fire prevention cases did your smoke alarm execute today. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/michaelbolton/status/17910281645
Wnen people say that semantics aren’t important, I don’t understand what they mean, but I guess it doesn’t matter. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/michaelbolton/status/17912608272
instead of asking if the sw meets the spec, ask if the spec writer understands the business. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/mheusser/status/20301744012
Today I heard a derivative from the “No user would ever do that!” statement: “The code works according to current use”. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/MichelKraaij/status/53048570135330816
Perspective: when under pressure to release the product, remember that the world has survived until now without it. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/michaelbolton/status/60676529159553025
Bringing about change within your team is satisfying, Influencing and persuading senior stakeholders….priceless! Here – https://twitter.com/#!/charrett/status/132294460737458176
Metrics are not meant to be interpreted they are required to be self evident. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/sbarber/status/132108348563791872
If humans were perfect thinkers, we wouldn’t need to test our work. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/skalra/status/72585120992858112
When I hear “It’s better for you, Customer, to report that than me,” I detect an organization that listens to neither customers nor workers. Here – https://twitter.com/#!/michaelbolton/status/123257010362916865